Wisconsin Accidents

FAQ | Glossary | Topics
ESP ENG
Definition

comparative negligence

The worst mistake people make is admitting fault too quickly because an insurance adjuster or defense lawyer says they were "partly to blame," as if that ends the case. That is how this term gets used against injured people: to shrink a payout or block it entirely. What it really means is that more than one person can share blame for an accident, and the money can be reduced based on each person's percentage of fault.

In Wisconsin, comparative negligence follows a modified rule under Wis. Stat. § 895.045. If an injured person is 50% or less at fault, they can still recover damages, but the award is reduced by that percentage. If they are 51% or more at fault, recovery is barred. So if a jury says damages are $100,000 and the injured person was 20% at fault, the recovery drops to $80,000.

This matters in car crashes on I-94, construction site incidents in Kenosha or Milwaukee, and workplace-related third-party cases across places like Madison, Green Bay, and the Fox Valley. Defense lawyers look for anything to argue the injured person caused the harm: speeding, not watching footing, ignoring warnings, or not using safety gear.

That can directly affect a personal injury claim, settlement, or trial verdict. Even a small shift in fault percentage can mean thousands of dollars gained or lost.

by Mike Wojciechowski on 2026-03-21

Nothing on this page should be taken as legal advice — it's general information that may not apply to your specific case. If you've been hurt, a lawyer can tell you where you actually stand.

Get a free case review →
← All Terms Home